Tag: #Trump Family

No comments

Trump’s Second Term Draws Fire Over Corruption

  By

Trump vs America

                                                   Trump is Phony as a Three Dollar Bill

Trump vs America

By William Jones

Trump’s Second Term Draws Fire Over Power, Profit, and Repeated Institutional Battles

WASHINGTON, D.C., September 2026 — President Donald Trump’s second White House has had a slew of issues concerning private enterprises, foreign gifts, executive power, government regulation, immigration, federal jobs, education, and trade. His first term already brought up questions of conflicts of interest, pardons, Trump’s properties, and the ouster of independent watchdogs. Those conflicts have now faded away. Trump, who has been in office since January 2025, has made a series of moves that have been rejected in court, attacked by ethics authorities, worried about by Congress and the American public, and that has raised multiple accusations from a variety of multiple  that he is exceeding the powers of the presidency.

Crypto Ventures Generate Billions

Trump’s family cryptocurrency holdings have emerged as one of the most obvious financial scandals of his second term. Four of the Trump-related crypto businesses have made an estimated $2.3 billion for the family from 2024 to April 2026, according to a Reuters investigation. The projects consist of World Liberty Financial and $TRUMP meme coin. Reuters reports that the losses were similar in magnitude for outside investors, but the Trump family reaped ownership and revenue-sharing benefits. Critics say the president has the ability to sway an industry where his family has a lot of money tied up.

Meme Coin Buyers Gain Presidential Access

The $TRUMP coin led to another ethical issue, as 220 of its biggest investors were invited to dine with Trump at his golf club in Virginia in May 2025. Additional access was given to the top 25 investors. Critics wondered if rich or foreign investors could buy up a seat near a sitting president when they could buy cryptocurrency using wallets that don’t release their names. Trump’s presence at the dinner was called personal time in the White House, and the AP made note of him speaking behind a lectern with the presidential seal.

Qatar’s $400 Million Aircraft

Growing concerns about foreign influence became another issue after the acceptance of a luxury Boeing 747 from Qatar for the president’s use. The aircraft’s value is estimated at approximately $400 million. The snag of course is that it will need at least a billion dollars in significant modifications to its security and communications systems to be used as Air Force One, Reuters reported. Trump and MAGA brushed aside any notion that ethics should come into play and said it would be very foolish to turn down this valuable aircraft. Critics raised concerns about the possibility of an obligation or suspected influence by the Qatar government because of such an “extraordinary gift by a foreign government.”

Independent Watchdogs Removed

Trump also acted against those charged with regulating government misbehaviors. Independent watchdogs, such as inspectors general, were fired early in the administration, raising concerns that investigators of waste, fraud, abuse, and retaliation might be replaced by those more loyal to the president. One federal judge has concluded that Trump’s termination of Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel, was illegal because of safeguards for independent officials, which were created to prevent improper pressure from the White House.

Federal Workers Face Mass Dismissals

Another major controversy for the administration was the attempt to extensively reduce the size of the federal workforce. Agencies went on a job restructuring campaign that resulted in the firing or elimination of thousands of workers. The Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, and associated agencies were particularly hard hit in 2025, when approximately 10,000 cuts were made to these health agencies. The cuts were deemed to be long-overdue changes to bureaucracy by supporters. Scientists, regulators, and experts could suddenly be lost, leading to a weakening of key government services, critics said.

Supreme Court Rejects Sweeping Tariffs

Trump’s emergency powers to impose sweeping global tariffs suffered a major blow in court. His bid for emergency economic powers to implement broad tariffs was rejected by the Supreme Court in February 2026 and weakened one of the Trump administration’s key economic strategies. Trump attacked the decision and threatened to pursue other legal strategies for erecting tariffs. The debate also raised the broader constitutional issue—how much economic power does a president have without specific congressional approval?

Birthright Citizenship Targeted Again

Trump’s opposition to birthright citizenship has butted heads with constitutional arguments over the years. His original second-term executive order was to deny automatic citizenship to some of those born in the United States. The previous order was rejected by the courts, however, and in August 2026, Trump issued a “narrower” order. The federal judge was not so sure about its constitutionality, since the Supreme Court had already ruled the previous attempt unconstitutional in light of the 14th Amendment. The new challenge is still in effect.

Education Department Cutbacks Blocked

The administration also made a concerted effort to cut significantly the size of the Department of Education’s workforce and to shift significant functions to other departments. The plan was blocked by a federal judge in 2025, saying that the executive branch cannot effectively dismantle a department created by Congress unless Congress gives it its approval. Education authority is something Trump has long advocated should be handed back to the states. The restructuring was a risk to students who are protected by federal programs, administered by the federal government, and required to meet civil-rights requirements, opponents said.

Justice Department Reopens Trump-Era Grievances

Still another controversy involves the Justice Department’s review of those officials who participated in previous inquiries of Trump. In August 2026, the FBI began interviewing personnel linked to the search of his residence on Mar-a-Lago in 2022 as it expanded its probe into whether U.S. investigations have infringed on Trump’s rights, according to Reuters. The review is a required measure of accountability, according to supporters. There is a disturbing prospect in the eyes of critics that federal law enforcement abilities are being channeled towards individuals who investigated the president before he was sworn in.

Questions Grow Over Justice Department Independence

Former Trump personal lawyer Attorney General Todd Blanche has been under separate watch on the independence of the Justice Department. During an interview in August 2026, Blanche denied being Trump’s political attorney and not the country’s top law-enforcement official. Politically charged investigations and proposals that have worked in favor of Trump allies have been cited as signs of a diminishment in institutional independence. Blanche, our newest AG, says that he’s being fair and honest with the law.

A Presidency Under Continuing Scrutiny

What unites these 10 controversies is an underlining theme: the growing permeable boundaries of presidential power and hyper-public and personal and familial interests. Trump’s supporters believe they were given a mandate by voters to have a president who is aggressively working to fulfill that mandate, to dismantle bureaucracy, and to challenge institutions that they view as being unaccountable.

Critics see something more worrying. As Trump-affiliated businesses continue to generate massive private profits, they contend that the courts, watchdogs, career officials, independent prosecutors, and disclosure regulations are all being run over by a lawless executive branch.

Larger than any of Trump’s lawsuits, firings, cryptocurrency business, or executive orders, is the central question of his second term. It is whether the institutions established to check the power of the president will survive if the president keeps opposing these institutions. In a democracy, accountability must be based not on the goodwill of the occupant of the White House. It relies on the ability of the law, independent oversight, Congress, courts and an informed public to say no.

 

References

https://www.reuters.com/investigations/parsing-trumps-crypto-profits-investors-losses-2026-06-09/

https://apnews.com/article/0e2d7ca5170bf594d44a391884ec52b3

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/us-formally-accepts-luxury-jet-qatar-trump-new-york-times-2025-05-21/

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-judge-declares-trumps-firing-watchdog-agency-head-illegal-2025-03-02/

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/trump-administration-begins-mass-layoffs-health-agencies-sources-say-2025-04-01/

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/g20-countries-should-consider-more-trade-barriers-with-china-cut-imbalances-2026-08-30/

https://www.reuters.com/world/us-judge-wont-immediately-block-trumps-newest-order-limiting-birthright-2026-08-28/

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-judge-blocks-trump-administration-plan-gut-education-department-2025-05-22/

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/doj-seeks-question-fbi-officials-tied-search-trump-mar-a-lago-estate-sources-say-2026-08-20/

https://apnews.com/article/37c32a3751aaeac09fde5e415c1d4879

 

 

 

Blatant, Spit in Your Face, Corruption From Trump, Inc.

  By , , , ,

Blatant, Spit in Your Face, Corruption From Trump, Inc.

Blatant, Spit in Your Face, Corruption From Trump, Inc.

Editor: Donald Trump is convinced that he and his family… and his cronies, can get away with the money and no one will stop him. I think he’s misjudged the situation; at least I hope so. We will find out in about 85 days whether all the dark money and corruption will keep the MAGA’s in office. The only thing I believe that can end this unimaginable corruption is an enormous voter turn out. A turn out so big and impressive for the Democrats that there won’t be but a handful of GOP/MAGA legislators left in office. They stopped Viktor Orban in Hungary and we can stop Trump, but it will take a dramatic tsunami of opposition to him to make it happen. If you are not registered to vote, get off your ass and get signed up, we will need every disgusted, ashamed, humiliated and outraged citizen to vote- Calamity, aka D.S. Mitchell

By William Jones

It seems most administrations face accusations of some level of corruption. But few have had the scale that has been tied to Donald Trump’s second term.  Since January 2025, nonpartisan trackers, congressional investigators, and journalists have documented a pattern that can no longer be ignored. Several government benefits including appointments, contracts, dropped investigations, pardons, and policy decisions all flowing toward the President and his family alongside his donors and allies. Still, there are many defenders of the administration who insist this is ordinary political discretion, or even a crackdown on fraud committed by others. In truth, the volume and consistency of the cases below suggest something more deep-rooted and against the political culture of this great nation. Voters deserve a clear account of what has actually been documented, and what remains contested.

1) Family Business and Conflicts of Interest

The hallmark of corruption allegations involves members of the President’s own family profiting from decisions made inside his administration. Reports show his first term senior adviser, and son in-in-law, Jared Kushner, reportedly sought to raise more than five billion dollars for his private equity firm from Gulf governments, including Saudi Arabia, while simultaneously serving as a key U.S. envoy to the region, a dual role that watchdogs say blurs the line between diplomacy and personal enrichment. Separately, reporting has tied a six-hundred-twenty-million-dollar Pentagon loan for a small manufacturing startup to intervention from a senior trade adviser, arriving only months after a venture capital firm run by Donald Trump Jr. took a stake in that same company. The U.S. Air Force has also signed a contract with a drone manufacturer backed by Trump Jr. and brother Eric. Taken individually, any one of these could be coincidence. Taken together, critics argue they describe a pattern in which proximity to the President’s family has become a predictable path to federal money.

2) Donor Access and Pay-to-Play Appointments

Nonpartisan trackers such as the Campaign Legal Center have catalogued dozens of instances in which political donations or financial arrangements appear to have shaped major personnel and policy decisions; including Cabinet and ambassadorial appointments, pardons and commutations, and the dropping of federal investigations. One case that drew particular attention involved a bridge connecting Detroit and Windsor, Ontario; the President moved to block a competing bridge from opening, a decision that came within hours of its owner making a million-dollar donation tied to securing a meeting with the Commerce Secretary. In another instance, at least twenty Cabinet members are reported to have directed more than thirty million dollars toward efforts that personally benefited the President through political donations, property spending, stock holdings, and contributions to Trump-aligned funds. Congress has also opened a probe into more than sixty million dollars in corporate payments to the President’s planned presidential library, after the original fund was dissolved and the money’s destination became unclear.

3) Regulators and Enforcement Bending to Financial Interests

A third pattern involves officials responsible for oversight instead holding financial stakes in the industries they regulate. The acting Attorney General reportedly ordered the termination of several crypto-related investigations while personally holding hundreds of thousands of dollars in crypto investments. The FAA Administrator held millions of dollars in an airline’s stock for months after taking office. And a top aide to the Homeland Security Secretary has been accused of soliciting kickbacks from a federal contractor, the private prison operator GEO Group, in exchange for contract growth. Even routine government spending has drawn scrutiny; a no-bid contract to clean the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool went to a firm tied to a longtime presidential supporter, and the pool has since turned green with algae. Meanwhile, taxpayers are now reported to be covering roughly half the cost of a new White House ballroom, despite earlier assurances that private donors would foot the entire bill. And if it was totally donor built what favors would  be doled out? The stench is unimaginable.

4) Legal Settlements That Benefit the President Personally

Perhaps most striking is a reported settlement in which the President dropped a lawsuit against the federal government in exchange for the Justice Department establishing a fund of roughly $1.8 billion, described by the administration as compensation for ‘victims of lawfare.’ Government watchdogs have called the arrangement a use of federal legal machinery for personal financial benefit. Separately, dozens of former federal judges have signed court filings describing a related proposed IRS settlement as corrupting the judicial process itself, and Senate Judiciary Committee members have opened a records-preservation inquiry into how that deal was reached. These are not routine legal outcomes. They are settlements negotiated by an administration the President himself controls, resolving disputes in which he is both the plaintiff and the defendant. One judge, called the whole action a “fraud against the court.”

Why Has There Been No Criminal Conviction?

This remains one of the big questions. There have been congressional inquiries, administration disputes, and even watchdog reports, but none has led to criminal convictions. The White House itself has pointed to its own Task Force to Eliminate Fraud. Its reports uncovers billions of dollars in fraudulent government contracts, benefit claims, and pandemic-era loans, and frames itself as the party rooting out corruption rather than committing it. Republican officials argue that personnel and policy decisions fall within a President’s normal discretion, that donor-funded ambassadorships and access have a long bipartisan history in American politics, and that much of the criticism, including a newly proposed ‘Anti-Corruption Bureau’ from Senate Democrats is itself politically timed ahead of the midterm elections. Americans should weigh the documented pattern above against that defense, and against the fact that discretion, poor judgment, and criminal corruption are not always the same thing, even when they look similar from the outside.

To Conclude

Democracy depends on public confidence that government decisions are made in the public interest rather than for private gain. Whether or not any individual case here ultimately results in prosecution, the sheer accumulation of documented conflicts including family enrichment, donor access, regulators with financial stakes, and self-benefiting legal settlements has pushed corruption concerns into the center of the national conversation in a way rarely seen in modern American politics. Congress, the courts, and the voters each have a role in demanding transparency and accountability, regardless of party.

Reference Links

https://campaignlegal.org/document/tracking-trump-administrations-most-corrupt-transactions

https://www.murphy.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/murphy-details-unprecedented-corruption-of-trump-white-house-over-the-last-500-days

https://represent.us/trump-corruption-tracker/

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/resources/human-rights/2026-march/trump-administrations-rampant-pay-to-play-corruption-threatens-our-democracy/

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/epic-corruption-plain-sight

https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/release/whitehouse-renews-probe-into-cop-beaters-slush-fund-and-trump-family-tax-fraud-amnesty-deal/

https://www.ms.now/news/schumer-anti-corruption-agency-trump

https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/05/trump-administrations-full-scale-war-on-fraud/